A correction
Bruno Scarpellini was kind enough to point out to me a minor misprint that he discovered. In particular, on page 178 of line 11 froom above, that is, in clause (i) of definition 9.3.4, one has to replace
that is, one has to replace dy with dz.
H(z(\lambda)) dy/d\lambda with H(z(\lambda)) dz/d\lambda,
that is, one has to replace dy with dz.
Σχόλια